Multigamy – the what, how and why?

Over time, I have gradually become slightly annoyed with people using the terms monogamy (implied ethics and consent) and non-monogamy (implied unethical so must be prefixed with consensual- or ethical-), as two directly opposing relationship dynamics.

I believe it’s time to upend this narrative, redefine the norm and see relationship dynamics as existing on a spectrum that includes single (by choice), monogamy, monogamish, mono-poly, open relationships, triads, quads, polycules, parallel poly, kitchen table poly, hierarchical and non-hierarchical poly, etc. etc. 


Calling the practice of seeing multiple people in parallel, in whatever configuration, ethical non monogamy, basically implies that non-monogamy is unethical and therefore requires a qualifier. Ethics are anyway subjective and not universal, so this is not a very helpful qualifier. When most people only know of 2 dynamics (monogamy and cheating), it would make sense that you have to specify that an honest, transparent and consensual practice of non monogamy is in fact ethical. However as the spectrum of relationship dynamics becomes more accessible and well known, I feel that simply saying non-monogamy is sufficient and implies both ethics and consent. A step further would be to avoid defining the practice as what it is not (‘non-‘) and instead give it a neutral identifier, for example ‘Multigamy’. If ‘mono’ means 1 partner, ‘multi’ would be multiple partners.

Designer relationships can work for the people involved, and not need critique or opinion from those not involved. 

Mono = one | Multi = many | Gamy = relationship (marriage, originally)

Multigamy is a positive term describing all multiple-relationship dynamics. It has no negative implication like ‘non-monogamy’. Ethics and consent are a given, as just like in monogamy, some people behaving unethically do not represent the entire community.

Multigamy can look like many things. It doesn’t even mean those involved are polyamorous. They may be monoamorous & polysexual (swinging, open relationship) for example. Here are some more common dynamics that fall under the umbrella of multigamy:

  • Swinging
  • Mono-poly
  • Hierarchical polyamory
  • Triad (or thrupple)

  • Open relationship
  • Solo-poly
  • Egalitarian polyamory
  • Quad and larger polycules

If someone asks if you practice ethical or consensual non-monogamy, you can ask them if they practice ethical-monogamy. They might rethink their assumptions.

I was interviewed on a podcast called Practicing Polyamory where I explain in more detail why I use Multigamy instead of non-monogamy.

7 Comments

  1. […] no particular order, here are the reasons that I am polyamorous and choose multigamy as my preferred relationship dynamic. I will probably add to this list from time to time, as I […]

  2. […] Multigamy: Usually referred to as non-monogamy, often pre-ambled with ‘ethical’ or ‘consentual’, it is a relationship dynamic that includes more than two people. It is a conscious choice to spend time and energy on multiple partners. […]

  3. […] of feeling compersion. The fact is, compersion is NOT a requirement for practicing healthy, happy multigamy or polyamory. You should not be expected to feel compersive towards your partner, not should you […]

  4. […] long and we cover my own background with polyamory, compersion and jealousy and I explain what Multigamy […]

  5. […] behaviour. Most red flags are common to all relationship types and dynamics, be it monogamy or multigamy. Noticing one red flag does not necessarily mean that the relationship is doomed. Only that […]

  6. […] and other forms of multigamy (non-monogamy) have been getting a lot of exposure in recent years. They appear in mainstream TV […]

  7. […] took me some time to practice polyamory and multigamy in it’s myriad variations before I could definitively say, I have always been polyamorous but […]

Leave a Reply to The Spectra of emotional and sexual connection – Open Relating Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *